I
AM OUTRAGED THAT QUEERS ARE SURVIVING[1]
I am out at a gay bar, and it's a
convivial atmosphere. Guys are friendly
and flirtatious. But as I look them over
at some length, I don't ultimately feel too compelled by any of them, so I go
to sit on the outside patio on a bench, by myself.
There are still guys out here, though
at a comfortable distance. The music
isn't really moving me hard or fast enough (I'm a rock and roll gay boy who
actually really likes hard rock and sometimes needs it), so I put on my
headphones.
It's then that I notice a guy who is
so beautiful to me that he makes me upset, makes me panic a little about what
to do about it - in a way that people you find really beautiful and attractive
can do.
I'm upset because I don't know how to
react to him, and I'm flummoxed by his offensive beauty - offensive because I
was doing just fine with my distance and my music and my watching, and yet now
I feel consternation over what to do about this beautiful guy I've seen. What would I or could I even do with
him? Lie down next to him and just behold
him? He had the kind of beauty that
makes the desire for sex move into a subordinate position to the desire just to
be in his aura - to merely be near or
with him.
I go through the vacillations of
trying not to look/looking, trying to forget about him/thinking only of him,
deciding to try/deciding not to try.
During one of my failed attempts to not look, he catches my eye, and
smiles in a way that shows marked notice and interest. I'm shocked and horrified and panicked.
Now the stakes are higher, and I'm
more upset and flummoxed than ever. What
the hell and fuck to do now? I'm
nervous.
He is dark. He has black eyes and black hair. Thick and long eyelashes. An exquisite face with a small but elegant nose
and incredible cheek bones. His eyes are both extremely dark and extremely
alive and bright, but without any luridness at all, and his bearing shows what
seems to be a confidence and poise in the bearing of great beauty. His hair is
thick and wavy. He's dressed a bit dorkily, and I'm not sure how much awareness
he has of this. He's wearing long shorts and cream colored socks that are of
medium height. He's muscular and a bit
hairy in certain places, but with no signs whatsoever of the common gym or
sculpted looks or of the "bear" look.
He has a naturally tight body in the manner of a foreigner and of a
young man, and not the overfed look of an American in his second youth, like
most of the guys here. I finally decide that his socks must not be contrived,
because he otherwise shows no signs whatsoever of contrivance.
I look.
He looks, and smiles easily.
I look
away.
I look back.
He looks.
His friend sits down near me and then he himself
moves closer.
He speaks to me.
[Happiness, Excitement, Possibility, and Panic all
enter from stage left and fulminate]
My
expectation is something like that his life and thoughts will consist of things
befitting great beauty as a variety of greatness, the kind of thoughts and
living one reads about in ancient literature - the kind of thoughts that one
should be able to impute to someone who possesses great beauty.
So I am
surprised when, after his lengthy asking about me, I get to ask him about himself
and hear his response. I ask him what
motivates him, what excites him, what gets his motor going these days.
He
tells that he is merely surviving.
He has
a mundane job, lives in the Valley, and is merely surviving. He actually uses
the word 'surviving'.
I have
told him that I am out that night because I did not want to go back to where I
am staying - where I am merely staying.
And that I came out because, being in survival mode, I had not wanted to
go sleep with the handful of people with whom I could trade sex for comfort and
camaraderie, for a place to sleep, for weed.
He told
me that he understood completely and that he had recently passed out of such a
phase, and was holding on to his slightly improved state of survival. He seemed terrified of going back to that
state that I was in, and yet, for him, where he was now was clearly still only
just surviving.
It became evident in talking to him that I was
hearing what I had heard many times from honest L.G.B.T. persons - that they had ceased to dare to dream after
being forced into survival mode for a rather long time. This ceasing to do anything but place cautious
stock in survival was then too familiar, and also personal. When people ask me
how I am doing I often answer that I am surviving, since I am not one who
favors either dishonesty or small talk, and who thus prefers honest answers,
even if they interrupt the requisite politenesses that people want to get
through quickly in any conversation.
But in
this boy, with his great beauty, beauty that one might write about, beauty that
made me think that he could be a king or a god, there was, so incongruously, a
depressed demeanor that the people often call 'realistic', one that is a
particular cohort of L.G.B.T. persons now, despite heteros' labeling of us as
'fabulous'.
We are
somewhere between fifty and sixty per cent of the homeless in the United States,
and we have lost so much of our independence and freedom.
Being
an older queen, I can actually remember the 80's. "In the late 80's, all the young gay
guys that I knew had their own apartments, a car, and enough money and freedom
to go out to dinner once or twice a week and to go on at least short vacations
pretty frequently", I am saying to my friend one day. He concurs, saying
that he remembers this too. Today
though, I know almost no gay guys in their twenties who have such means or
freedom or independence.
This is
to leave aside the social and political facts of our lives. And, no one wants to mention the needs of gay
men. How we have lost our sexual freedom and independence, and thus free
determination of even our sexual, romantic relationships and friendships. How our needs are not the same as those of
straights, and how our economic and social abuse and degradation are
related.
So many
of us are in survival mode, deprived of independence and of the freedom to
develop our own lives and communities, and I am enraged by this. Outraged.
The words of Dorothy Allison run through me, and I repeat them often and
everywhere. She wrote better of this
problem than I, and wrote in an earlier time, wrote to us as queer persons "I
need you to do more than survive."[2]
I am
outraged at the lost potential of queer persons. I define oppression in somewhat the way that
Terry Eagleton defined it[3],
as the forced loss of development of possibility and potential.
The
beauty of this boy bespoke a potential that his resignation seemed to confirm
had been there but had been relegated to the shadows by his forced entry into
survival mode.
Beauty's
potential, intelligence's potential, the creation of culture and new social
forms, voluptuous living: all of these,
are not really possible under the heterosexual political regime, which speaks
out a discourse of "gay-friendliness"[4]
and of "progress"[5]
for queers, when all the while our potential and our possibility ends up in the
gray, depressed, tiring and deflating world of economic survival. Survival is worse for us because we're not
the prosaic ones. We're not the ones who make life dull and stupid. We are not trying to define or prove ourselves
at others' expense. We are not sexually assaulting
everyone publicly with our fascist "family values" fetishism, or with
our desperate, hysterical, sexually aggressive and assaultive sanctification of
children. We are not somehow at the same time delusional and insipid.
We are not the common fodder and exudate of the heterosexual political regime.
We are not made for survival.
We are not made for survival.
We are capable
of living so many possibilities that are buried under the mode of life that
surviving under this regime is.
It felt
to me like this boy's beauty deserved better.
It feels to me like so much queer extraordinariness deserves better.
Forgive
me as a corny old queen with a memory of a time when queer life was not about
survival, and for being one who waxes nostalgic about this.
But, if
I am allowed to speak as such, I would like to claim that we should no longer
talk so much about being "out" but rather we should speak about
survival, but that if we speak of being "out" we speak only of it with its
proper suffix appended, and thus speak only of outrage.
Action
Jackson
(
My heartfelt thanks to T.S. Bandito for inviting me to be a guest blogger)
[1]
This blog post is by guest blogger Action Jackson.
[2] Dotz
Allison, 'Survival is the Least of My Desires'
[3]
Eagleton, Terry. Ideology (Don't make me go find the page number and the other bibliographic stuff yet; or do make me
go find it, so this can get published).
[4]
Gay Friendliness: 1. A mode of the invasion of gay spaces by
heterosexuals 2. The euphemism which is
intended to disguise this invasion.
(These definitions from the Gay Dictionary).
[5] Progress
here means the supposedly improved ability to live without being attacked so
long as we live and act like conservative or commonplace heterosexuals.
No comments:
Post a Comment